How Michael Skubala turned Lincoln City into a model of efficiency without spending big

By Holly Wright

In an era where success in English football is often tied to financial muscle, Michael Skubala’s work at Lincoln City stands out as a reminder that smart coaching, structure, and identity can sometimes outweigh budgets.

While clubs such as Birmingham City and Wrexham have invested heavily in the pursuit of promotion and league dominance, Lincoln’s rise under Skubala has been built on something far less glamorous but far more sustainable: organisation, clarity, and an ability to maximise every player in the squad.

It is a model built on coaching detail rather than transfer headlines, and it has allowed Lincoln to remain competitive without needing to match the spending power of their rivals.

Here, Holly Wright explores the Imps’ surge towards the Championship.

For exclusive stories and all the detailed EFL news you need, subscribe to The Football League Paper website, digital edition, or newspaper from as little as 14p a day.

Building a system, not a star-driven project

Since taking charge in 2023, Skubala has prioritised structure over star names.

Lincoln’s tactical identity is consistent and clearly defined, typically operating with a 4-2-3-1 shape that blends aggressive pressing with quick, vertical transitions.

Rather than relying on expensive individuals, Lincoln functions as a collective unit.

Pressing triggers are carefully drilled, distances between lines are tightly controlled, and possession is used with purpose rather than simply for control.

There is a clear emphasis on winning the ball in advanced areas and turning defensive actions into attacking opportunities as quickly as possible.

This approach has allowed Lincoln to consistently compete with better-funded squads by removing unpredictability from their performance levels.

Even when facing stronger opposition on paper, their structure keeps them in games and often allows them to dictate key phases.

Set-pieces and marginal gains making the difference

One of the clearest examples of Lincoln’s efficiency is their set-piece output.

Under Skubala, they have developed a reputation for being one of the most dangerous sides in the division from dead-ball situations, particularly long throw-ins, both in attack and in defensive organisation.

That focus on marginal gains reflects a wider club philosophy: finding competitive edges where others are not looking closely enough.

Set-piece routines are meticulously planned, with clear patterns of movement designed to exploit space rather than rely on chance deliveries into the box.

Lincoln also places heavy emphasis on transitional moments, recovery runs, and rest defence structures. These details often go unnoticed externally, but internally, they form the backbone of their consistency.

It is this accumulation of small advantages that allows them to bridge the gap against richer clubs over a full season.

Outperforming bigger budgets

The contrast with clubs such as Birmingham and Wrexham is striking.

Both clubs have operated with significantly higher investment levels, using transfer spending to accelerate their ambitions and build squads with greater individual pedigree.

Lincoln, by comparison, have taken a more restrained approach, relying on recruitment value, loan markets, player development, and tactical cohesion rather than headline signings.

While Birmingham and Wrexham’s strategies prioritise scale and individual quality, Lincoln’s success under Skubala shows that cohesion and clarity can reduce the advantage that money provides.

A squad built on trust

One of Skubala’s most important achievements is making players better within defined roles.

Rather than asking individuals to carry games, he gives each player a specific function within a structured system.

That clarity has created a “greater than the sum of its parts” effect.

Players rotate, press, cover, and recover with consistency, knowing exactly when to step out and when to hold shape.

This reduces uncertainty and increases reliability, two traits that are often more valuable over a long season than sporadic brilliance.

It also helps explain Lincoln’s impressive consistency in results despite operating with a relatively modest squad budget.

Even when personnel changes are made, the structure remains intact, which limits performance drop-off.

READ MORE: EFL roundup: Bromley title glory, Billy Sharp signs off in style & Richie Wellens rant